Somewhat Seriously

by Jafar Jalili

We have lost access to the roots of our moral values

Without cognitive access to their birthplace, the dismissal of said values has only been a matter of time

Without grounding in values, man will find himself in the bottomless pit of nihilism

This podcast will endeavor to answer questions such as:

  • Are there better or worse ways of living our lives?
  • Is it worthwhile to speak of notions s ... 
 ...  Read more

Podcast episodes

  • Season 1

  • Epistemology of emotions, AI and Consciousness, and utility of the notion of Free Will with Prof. Andreotta

    Epistemology of emotions, AI and Consciousness, and utility of the notion of Free Will with Prof. Andreotta

    Professor Adam Andreotta is a philosophy researcher from Perth, Western Australia. He has a doctoral degree in Philosophy from the University of Western Australia In this episode he explains, from a philosophical perspective, how it is that we come to know our emotions and challenges the social constructivist view of the interpretation of our emotions Further we touched on AI and the hard question of consciousness. And inevitably of course, Free Will came up where we touched on the takes of the likes of Sam Harris on the notion of Free Will

  • Metaphysical Theology and the Philosophy of Science with Dr. Paul Tyson

    Metaphysical Theology and the Philosophy of Science with Dr. Paul Tyson

    This episode suggests that different culturally assumed philosophies of matter produce different culturally assumed natural philosophies. This is illustrated three times in Western intellectual history. Firstly, a Platonist idealist philosophy of matter is integral with, and produces, the natural philosophy of Greco-Roman antiquity and Byzantium. Secondly, an Aristotelian hylomorphic philosophy of matter is integral with, and produces, the natural philosophy of Medieval Christendom. And thirdly, a modern Democritean atomism is integral with, and produces, modern science and technology

  • Luce Irigaray

    Luce Irigaray

    Luce Irigaray offers us a challenge. She says, “it is not a matter of changing this or that within a horizon already defined as human culture. It is a question of changing the horizon itself – of understanding that our interpretation of human identity is both theoretically and practically wrong.” It is to this challenge that her concept of the sensible-transcendental is offered, and it is through this concept that she believes the crisis of our age, sexuate indifference, might be overcome