Because I respect this process, I abide strictly by what I call the Fairness Principle throughout my investigations. I owe this fairness to the topics I audit, I owe it to myself, and I owe it directly to you.. Therefore, while I accept criticism completely, I demand that it originate from a position of truthful, honest comprehension, rather than a lack of attention or intellectual laziness. There is a vast distance between constructive critique and contrarian arguments. Someone who merely desires to argue for argumentation's sake will never be specific with you. They will say something vague, like, “It seems incomplete to me,” or “I didn’t really understand this point.” Those statements are valid observations, but they instantly beg the question: Which part exactly failed to register? Was it a lack of explanation on my end, or was it a lack of a ...