The Education Commute

The Education Commute

by The Education Commuter

Season 1

Draft, Indicative, Likely To Change: DfE's Provision Packages

"Specialist Provision Packages" gets said in staffrooms like it's already policy. It isn't — yet. DfE's own February document is explicit: draft, indicative, likely to change, no expert panel appointed. A SENCo and a class teacher with one specific EHCP pupil in mind work out what's actually real, what's just a promising three-category structure, and the one genuinely reassuring design principle that's already built in. What's covered: • The Number: three draft package categories — heavily adapted curriculum, adapted delivery in a different environment, access provisions • The honest gap between the promise (a legal entitlement to defined support) and what's actually real right now (an indicative draft, no expert panel appointed, no date) • The one reassuring design principle: a child can draw from more than one package, built in from the start • Same idea, three rooms: what the draft could mean for an early conversation in primary, the executive-function category in secondary, and how it mirrors existing specialist practice • Why "it's already policy" is the wrong staffroom shorthand, and what the honest three-part version sounds like instead Sources: • DfE, Specialist Provision Packages publication template (21 Feb 2026) • Commons Library CBP-10550 (wider SEND reform timeline) Actions for consideration: • Correct the staffroom shorthand: Specialist Provision Packages are a draft, not a live system — say so plainly when it comes up. • Don't apply package language to an EHCP review yet — nothing final exists to apply. • Watch for the expert panel's appointment — that's the real next milestone, not a publication date. • When explaining the draft to a parent, lead with the "more than one package" principle — it's the most reassuring, verified detail available right now. • Keep the wider SEND reform timeline in view alongside this — no EHCP changes before September 2030. Disclosure: Both voices on this show are synthesised (NotebookLM, Google); the research, reading and editorial judgement are done by a serving practitioner. Strand: Leaders

A Nagging Doubt Is Enough: KCSiE's 23 Paragraphs On Staff Concerns

Wet lunch, dinner hall door, and a colleague sitting with the same Year 5 for the third day running. Nothing's happened — it's just a feeling. Keeping children safe in education 2026 has a paragraph number for that feeling and says it's enough. A DSL and a midday supervisor walk through low-level concerns: what counts, who you tell, what gets written down, and why it protects the adult as much as the child. Source: DfE, Keeping children safe in education 2026, Part four section two (paras 506–528) — https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/keeping-children-safe-in-education--2 Both voices on this show are synthesised; the research, reading and editorial judgement are done by a serving practitioner. Strand: Staff

The Dutch Banned Phones: Problems Fell From 62% To 29%

England's mobile-phone guidance became statutory this summer and applies from 1 September — the whole day, lessons to lunch. The Netherlands got there two years earlier with a softer rule, then had its ministry measure what happened. Sixty-two per cent of secondary schools called phones a problem before; twenty-nine per cent after. Concentration up, results barely — and some teachers reporting more physical bullying at break. What transfers, what doesn't, and the gap England has to plan for. Sources: Ministerie van OCW (Netherlands) — Monitoringsonderzoek Landelijke afspraak mobiele telefoons en andere devices, factsheet (Kohnstamm Instituut & Oberon, 3 July 2025) — https://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten/rapporten/2025/07/03/bijlage-2-factsheet-eindrapport-monitoring-landelijke-afspraak-mobiele-telefoons-en-andere-devices-in-de-klas-kohnstamm-instituut-oberon ; Eurydice, 26 June 2025 — https://eurydice.eacea.ec.europa.eu/news/netherlands-ban-mobile-phones-classroom ; DfE — Mobile phones in schools (statutory from 29 June 2026) — https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/mobile-phones-in-schools/mobile-phones-in-schools Printable one-pagers for this episode, for parents and for the staffroom, at theeducationcommute.co.uk. Both voices on this show are synthesised; the research, reading and editorial judgement are done by a serving practitioner. Strand: Global Pioneers

91% Sounds Like An A Grade: The Letter Still Says 'Persistent'

"Your child's attendance is currently 91%." It sounds like an A grade — so why does the letter say "persistent"? A teacher and a document-reader translate the statutory attendance guidance for the person it was never written to: what 10% actually means, when you do and don't need a doctor's note, how the term-time-holiday fine really works, and the list of support a child with SEND or anxiety is entitled to before any letter turns legal. Source: DfE — Working together to improve school attendance (statutory guidance, July 2026) — https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/working-together-to-improve-school-attendance Both voices on this show are synthesised; the research, reading and editorial judgement are done by a serving practitioner. Strand: Parents & Carers

Ofsted Toolkit v2.0: The 4 Changes Your August SEF Missed

The inspection toolkit most schools read on INSET day stopped being the live version on the first Monday of term. Version 2.0 has been in force since 7 September — same five grades, same evaluation areas, and four changes Ofsted named itself: "and similar schools" in the achievement wording, mobile phone policies, families in the inclusion area, and who walks with the inspector on a learning walk. A deputy head checks her August SEF against all four. Sources: Ofsted — State-funded school inspection toolkit v2.0 (June 2026, for use from 7 September 2026) — https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/school-inspection-toolkit-operating-guide-and-information/inspection-information-for-state-funded-schools-for-use-from-september-2026 ; Ofsted press release, 12 June 2026 — https://www.gov.uk/government/news/inspection-materials-updated-ahead-of-september-2026 ; School inspection operating guide for inspectors, September 2026. Both voices on this show are synthesised; the research, reading and editorial judgement are done by a serving practitioner. Strand: Leaders

Every Adult Has The Power: DfE's 4 Purposes For Reasonable Force

Ten to one, wet playground, two Year 4s gone from pushing to punching, and the nearest adult is a midday supervisor thinking "am I allowed to touch him?" Since 1 April there's a 21-page answer. All staff have the power, for four purposes; "no contact" cultures are the thing schools are told not to have; and — the part that's now law — every significant use of force is written down and reported to the parent the same day. A reader and a teaching assistant walk through it. Sources: DfE — Restrictive interventions, including use of reasonable force, in schools (April 2026) https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/use-of-reasonable-force-in-schools Printable one-pager for this episode at theeducationcommute.co.uk Both voices on this show are synthesised; the research, reading and editorial judgement are done by a serving practitioner. Strand: Staff

New Zealand Copied Our Phonics Check: 26%, Then 35%

Forty words, real and made-up, read one child at a time — any Year 1 teacher in England knows the check. From 2025 New Zealand runs it twice in a child's first year, on top of a national structured-literacy mandate and an hour a day of reading. The first results: 26% at expectation after forty weeks in term one, 35% by term three. A Year 1 teacher and a document-reader work out what a country that just adopted England's model can actually tell England — and why the one number you can't compare is the headline one. Printable one-pager for this episode, free: https://theeducationcommute.co.uk/#newsletter-staff Two free newsletters, one for staff and one for parents and carers, same evidence written for the person reading it. Sources: NZ Government — Transforming how our children learn to read (2 May 2024) https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/transforming-how-our-children-learn-read · NZ Ministry of Education — Phonics checks and Terms 1 to 3, 2025 results https://newzealandcurriculum.tahurangi.education.govt.nz/phonics-checks-t32025-results · NZ Ministry of Education — One hour a day https://tahurangi.education.govt.nz/one-hour-a-day · DfE — Phonics screening check attainment 2024/25 https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/find-statistics/phonics-screening-check-attainment/2024-25 Both voices on this show are synthesised; the research, reading and editorial judgement are done by a serving practitioner. Strand: Global Pioneers

2, 2, 2, 4 Weeks: The Four EHCP Review Deadlines Parents Are Owed

The annual review letter gives a date and a list of names — and the attachment is never there. The SEND Code of Practice puts four clocks around that meeting, and all four belong to you: two weeks' notice, the pack two weeks before, the school's report two weeks after, the council's decision within four. A teacher who writes those reports and a document-reader walk through what a parent is actually entitled to, age by age: the three-to-six-month "should" for under-fives, the fifteenth of February deadline for a Year 6 child, and the moment at sixteen when the letters start going to your child instead of you. Sources: DfE / DHSC — SEND Code of Practice: 0 to 25 years (January 2015), paragraphs 1.8, 8.14–8.16, 9.166–9.169, 9.176, 9.178 and 9.179 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/send-code-of-practice-0-to-25 Both voices on this show are synthesised; the research, reading and editorial judgement are done by a serving practitioner. Strand: Parents & Carers

Suspension Isn't Automatic: KCSiE's 5 Alternatives First

Twenty to four, the head's on the corridor, "just you" — and the first sentence has "a parent has made" in it. Everyone in the staffroom knows what happens next: you're suspended, that's automatic. Keeping children safe in education 2026 says the opposite, in those words. A reader and a staffroom veteran go through Part four, section one: the five alternatives a school must consider first, the named contact and written reasons you're owed within a day, why the police can't require your suspension, the five outcome words, and which of them can ever appear in a reference. Sources: DfE — Keeping children safe in education 2026, Part four, section one (paragraphs 437–505) https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/keeping-children-safe-in-education--2 Printable one-pager for this episode at theeducationcommute.co.uk Both voices on this show are synthesised; the research, reading and editorial judgement are done by a serving practitioner. Strand: Staff

111 Shoulds, One Must: What KCSiE Part One Requires Of You

One hundred and eleven "shoulds". Five "musts". And in eighty-two paragraphs, exactly one legal "must" that lands on you personally rather than on your school or your local authority. This is the long one: the whole of Part one of Keeping children safe in education 2026 — the part every adult in an English school or college is expected to have read, and the part most of us signed for in September and skimmed. Read properly, in six pillars, with the paragraph numbers so you can check us. What's covered: who has to read Part one now, including staff who don't work directly with children (Summary); the five-part definition of safeguarding (para 3); the induction list you can be audited against, including the identity of the DSL and deputies (para 11); training that must include filtering and monitoring, with updates at least annually (para 12); never promise a child silence (para 14) and never let them feel they are creating a problem (para 15); "professional curiosity" as explicit permission (para 16); the children who may need extra support, including SEND "whether or not they have a statutory Education, Health and Care plan" (para 18); the four categories (paras 25-29); "just banter" named in the guidance itself (para 34); the FGM duty — the one "must" on an individual (para 46); act immediately (para 58); the DSL being unavailable "should not delay appropriate action" (para 61); "Data protection laws do not prevent the sharing of information" (para 63); one working day for a referral to be acknowledged (para 70); record the reasons as well as the decisions (para 74); the seven examples of poor practice (para 76); concerns about a colleague and the LADO route (paras 77-79); and whistleblowing, with the NSPCC Whistleblowing Advice Line on 0800 028 0285 (para 82). Source: DfE, Keeping children safe in education 2026 — Part one: Information for all school and college staff (September 2026). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/keeping-children-safe-in-education--2/part-one-overview-for-all-staff — Note: the "111 shoulds, five musts" count is our own count of the words in Part one (paras 1-82 plus Flowchart 1), not a figure the Department for Education publishes; the episode says so on air. Not covered: the Annex, which para 56 asks leaders and staff who work directly with children to read separately. Both voices on this show are synthesised. The research, reading and editorial judgement are done by a serving practitioner. One-pagers for this episode, free with an email: the staffroom version at https://theeducationcommute.co.uk/#newsletter-staff and the version for parents and carers at https://theeducationcommute.co.uk/#newsletter-parents Strand: Staff

6 of 6