The HAM Dilemma - Evidence of The Creator

The "HAM Dilemma" debunks the flawed assertion by naturalists and scientists that all organisms and their amazing Intrinsic Intelligence (II) which we also refer as their instincts are the product of random/spontaneous development "over time".

We may recognize the Artificial intelligence (AI) that we can embed into our machines to enable autonomous functioning may be the greatest of all our creations, similarly we must recognize the the Intrinsic Intelligence (II) that was embedded into all living organisms may be the greatest innovation of The Creator.

Naturalists and scientists all claim that the II that we call instincts that is embedded in all plants and animals, the intelligence that enables plants and animals to amaze us with the sophistication of their intelligence (think ants, bees etc. or birds building specialized nests etc.) are all the product of random/spontaneous/intelligence building these highly specific and detailed intelligence systems (???) "over time" and to emphasize they'll say "billions and billions" of years, never mind no animal lives more than a number of years and have NO WRITTEN or other tradition to pass on their "needs" or "desires" so that they somehow be imprinted in their DNA and intelligence that is somehow passed to the next generation!

If plants or animals could influence their genetic makeup, humans would certainly have cat-like night vision as this would have been an asset from the very first human both for protection from predators and enable us to be better hunters etc.

As we embark of building AI systems, we are now aware of the investment of resources (people, electricity, learning etc.) that is required to build systems that limit the hallucinations and other shortcomings or current systems, this requires the coordinated, focused and targeted efforts, something that random/spontaneous could hardly replicate in spite of the insistence of those who continue to insist that the sophistication of life must be the product of now non existent random/spontaneous relics in any living organism.

There are however three examples of systems that entail both the physical organism as well as the II that defies all this flawed insistence of "billions and billions of years" being responsible for what we all can observe in Nature, they are what we can call the "HAM dilemma"; the occurrence of Hibernation, Aestivation and Metamorphosis ("HAM").

HAM requires a combination of physical and embedded II to be perfect the very first time!

The first plant or animal that hibernates, aestivates or undergoes metamorphosis requires PERFECT physiology and all the associated synchronized chemical processes etc. much of which we understand today as well as what we will discover in the future (in spite of our thinking that our current scientists know everything!), the II that directed the first bear to seek to add mass, or for the first butterfly to "know" on which plants to lay eggs which becomes sustenance for their offspring, as well as directing the processes that maintain life in the slowed down or suspended animation phase for the aestivating frog, the hibernating bear or hibernating plants ALL HAD TO BE PERFECT AT FIST IMPLEMENTATION or extinction would have been the result.

HAM equipped plants and animals do not live "billions and billions of years" and winters, droughts etc. do not now and have never persisted for days then weeks etc. to enable any organism to evolve "over time" even if that time is "billions and billions of years" to enable random/spontaneous to modify their DNA and their II to change their behaviors and internal processing mechanisms to gradually evolve into the HAM equipped plants and animals we observe today.