BSPE Legal Marketing Podcast

BSPE Legal Marketing Podcast

by Viktoria Altman
News
Season 5

Can the Insurance Company Reduce My Settlement Because I Have Health Insurance Under Connecticut's § 52-225a? - Dan Petroskey

From DeFronzo & Petroskey, P.C. - Can the Insurance Company Reduce My Settlement Because I Have Health Insurance Under Connecticut's § 52-225a? explores how Connecticut’s collateral source reduction statute affects personal injury settlements and verdicts. This episode explains how Connecticut General Statutes § 52-225a can reduce the economic damages portion of a jury award after trial, while leaving non-economic damages like pain and suffering untouched. Listeners will gain insight into how health insurance payments, medical bills, and jury verdicts intersect in personal injury cases throughout Waterbury, New Haven County, and across Connecticut.The discussion breaks down how collateral source reductions work in practice, including the two-step calculation used by courts after a verdict at Waterbury Superior Court on Grand Street. The episode covers how payments from private health insurance, Medicare Advantage plans, and auto medical payments coverage may qualify as collateral sources under Connecticut General Statutes § 52-225b. It also explains how premiums paid by injured individuals, their families, or even employers can offset potential reductions, a principle reinforced by the Connecticut Supreme Court in Alvarado v. Black.Listeners will also learn about one of the most important exceptions to collateral source reductions: the right of subrogation. Many insurance plans, including self-funded ERISA plans as well as Medicare and Medicaid, may have reimbursement rights that prevent courts from reducing a plaintiff’s economic damages award. The episode highlights the impact of the Connecticut Supreme Court decision Marciano v. Jimenez, which confirmed that when any valid reimbursement right exists, courts cannot apply a collateral source reduction under § 52-225a.Dan Petroskey of DeFronzo & Petroskey, P.C., a personal injury attorney serving clients in Waterbury and throughout New Haven County since 2004, shares practical insight into how these rules influence settlement negotiations and trial outcomes. A graduate of Albany Law School and a member of both the Connecticut Bar Association and the Waterbury Bar Association, Dan discusses how careful documentation of medical bills, insurance payments, and premiums can protect injured clients’ recovery. The episode also examines how treatment at facilities such as Saint Mary's Hospital and Waterbury Hospital often intersects with these legal calculations in real personal injury cases across Connecticut. DeFronzo & Petroskey, P.C. 255 Bank St # 2b, Waterbury, CT 06702, United States (203) 756-7408 https://www.google.com/maps?cid=2074756120617399372
S5 · E130
Mar 10, 2026
6:39

What Is NY VTL § 1192(2-a), Aggravated DWI in New York? - Jason Bassett

From Law Offices of Jason Bassett, P.C. - What Is NY VTL § 1192(2-a), Aggravated DWI in New York? explores how Aggravated Driving While Intoxicated charges arise under New York Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192(2-a), including cases involving a blood alcohol content of 0.18% or higher and allegations tied to Leandra’s Law. This episode explains how these charges differ from a standard DWI under VTL § 1192(2) and why they are treated more seriously in courts throughout Suffolk County, Nassau County, and across Long Island. Listeners will learn how aggravated DWI cases can stem from either a high BAC chemical test or operating a vehicle while intoxicated or impaired by drugs with a child age 15 or younger in the vehicle. The discussion covers aggravated DWI per se under VTL § 1192(2-a)(a), the child passenger provision under VTL § 1192(2-a)(b), and the history behind Leandra’s Law following the death of Leandra Rosado on the Henry Hudson Parkway in New York City. It also explains the differences in fines, misdemeanor and Class E felony exposure, license revocation periods, ignition interlock device requirements, and plea bargaining restrictions compared with a standard DWI. The episode also discusses defense strategies that may arise in aggravated DWI cases, including challenges to the legality of the traffic stop, breathalyzer maintenance and calibration, blood test procedures, and the administration of Standardized Field Sobriety Tests following National Highway Traffic Safety Administration guidelines. Additional topics include Miranda rights, medical conditions such as GERD that may affect breath test readings, and how evidence issues can influence negotiations with prosecutors. Drawing on the background of Jason Bassett, Esq., a Suffolk County criminal defense lawyer and former prosecutor who has served as an Assistant District Attorney in Queens, Special Assistant Attorney General, Chief Deputy Commissioner for the Town of Islip Department of Public Safety Enforcement, and Principal Assistant County Attorney, this episode provides a clear overview of how aggravated DWI cases move through the courts. It also discusses what someone should do after an arrest, including documenting the traffic stop, understanding Prompt Suspension Law and Pringle hearings, and preparing for the legal process in Central Islip, Suffolk County, Nassau County, and throughout Long Island. Law Offices of Jason Bassett, P.C. 320 Carleton Ave # 4200, Central Islip, NY 11722, United States (631) 259-6060 https://www.google.com/maps?cid=695024758410642184
S5 · E129
Mar 10, 2026
4:51

Am I Being Sexually Harassed at Work? 5 Red Flags - BT Law Group, PLLC

From BT Law Group, PLLC - Am I Being Sexually Harassed at Work? 5 Red Flags explores the legal definition of workplace sexual harassment and the warning signs employees in Miami and throughout Florida should recognize. This episode explains how Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Florida Civil Rights Act (FCRA) protect workers from unwelcome sexual conduct, discrimination, and retaliation. Listeners learn how workplace behavior can cross the legal line when it creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive environment. Attorneys Anisley Tarragona and Jason D. Berkowitz discuss the two recognized forms of harassment: quid pro quo harassment and hostile work environment harassment. Drawing on their work representing employees throughout Miami-Dade County and South Florida, the discussion highlights common workplace situations including inappropriate sexual comments, unwanted physical contact, persistent requests for dates or sexual favors, and the sharing of explicit materials in the workplace. The episode also explains what employees can do if harassment occurs, including how to document incidents and report concerns through internal workplace policies. Listeners will learn how complaints may be filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) or the Florida Commission on Human Relations (FCHR), including the role of the EEOC Miami District Office in Miami Tower and the FCHR in Tallahassee. The conversation also references the U.S. Supreme Court decision in Bostock v. Clayton County and how Title VII protections apply to discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. Finally, the episode covers potential remedies available under both Title VII and the Florida Civil Rights Act, including back pay, compensatory damages, punitive damages, and injunctive relief. It also explains how sexual harassment claims may proceed through investigation, administrative review, and litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, helping employees understand their rights and legal options with BT Law Group, PLLC in Miami. BT Law Group, PLLC 3050 Biscayne Blvd STE 205, Miami, FL 33137 (305) 507-8506 https://www.google.com/maps?cid=1652198006057542154
S5 · E127
Mar 10, 2026
7:37

What Is the Difference Between a Living Trust and a Will? - Davies Law Firm

From Davies Law Firm - What Is the Difference Between a Living Trust and a Will? explains the key differences between two essential estate planning tools available to families across Central New York. In this episode, listeners will learn how a living trust and a will function under New York law, including when each document takes effect, how assets are transferred, and why many families in Syracuse and Onondaga County choose to incorporate both into a comprehensive estate plan. The discussion explores how a living trust allows assets to be managed during your lifetime and distributed without going through Onondaga County Surrogate's Court, while a will becomes effective only after death and must pass through the probate process governed by the Surrogate's Court Procedure Act (SCPA) and EPTL § 3-2.1. The episode explains how trustees and executors operate, what probate involves, and why timelines and court supervision can significantly impact how estates are settled in New York. Listeners will also hear insights from Frederick P. Davies and William P. Davies of Davies Law Firm, who help families throughout Central New York, including Syracuse, Madison County, Oneida County, Cortland County, Oswego County, and Cayuga County. Their backgrounds include Syracuse University College of Law, Albany Law School, and the University of Miami School of Law, and the conversation highlights practical considerations such as privacy concerns, trust funding, and the role of pour-over wills in a complete estate plan. The episode also addresses real-world planning considerations such as probate timelines, statutory executor commissions under SCPA § 2307, and privacy implications when estates become public record. It also discusses firearm reporting requirements under SCPA § 2509 and the role of the New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services (DCJS), helping listeners understand how estate planning decisions can affect their families. By the end of the episode, listeners will have a clearer understanding of how wills, living trusts, and thoughtful planning can help protect assets and guide families through the estate planning process in New York. Davies Law Firm 210 E Fayette St, Syracuse, NY 13202, United States (315) 472-6511 https://www.google.com/maps?cid=11885144913064493862
S5 · E126
Mar 10, 2026
4:49

Common Causes of Slip and Fall Accidents in Brooklyn - Samantha Kucher

From Kucher Law Group - Common Causes of Slip and Fall Accidents in Brooklyn explores the dangerous property conditions that frequently lead to fall injuries across Brooklyn and Kings County. This episode examines how hazards like wet floors, icy sidewalks, cracked pavement, broken stairs, and poor lighting contribute to serious accidents under New York premises liability law. Listeners will learn how property owners, landlords, and businesses are required to maintain safe premises and how failures in maintenance can put pedestrians, tenants, and visitors at risk. Brooklyn slip and fall attorney Michael Roitman discusses the most common hazards found throughout neighborhoods across Brooklyn, from busy retail stores and apartment buildings to sidewalks and parking garages. The conversation highlights the dangers of tracked-in rainwater, spilled liquids in grocery stores and restaurants, and winter conditions that create black ice on sidewalks and walkways. The episode also explains NYC snow removal rules under Administrative Code §16-123 and why timely snow and ice removal is critical for preventing injuries. The podcast also examines structural hazards such as cracked sidewalks caused by tree roots, damaged interior flooring, loose tiles, torn carpeting, and defective stairs with missing or unstable handrails. Poor lighting in stairwells, parking garages, and apartment hallways can hide these dangers, making accidents far more likely. Listeners will also hear how cluttered walkways, construction debris, and slippery surfaces like polished marble or freshly waxed floors create unexpected hazards throughout Brooklyn’s residential and commercial properties. Finally, the episode introduces the legal team behind Kucher Law Group, including founding attorney Samantha Kucher, trial lawyer Michael Roitman, and founding partner Alex Rybakov. Together, they represent injury victims throughout Brooklyn neighborhoods such as Bedford-Stuyvesant, Williamsburg, and Canarsie, helping people pursue compensation after falls caused by negligence. The discussion also references where serious fall injuries are often treated locally, including Maimonides Medical Center and NYC Health + Hospitals/Kings County, while explaining how injured individuals can take the next steps after a slip and fall accident in New York. Kucher Law Group 463 Pulaski St #1c, Brooklyn, NY 11221, United States (929) 563-6780 https://www.google.com/maps?cid=5716384493669715397
S5 · E125
Mar 10, 2026
4:32

Are Pre-Existing Conditions Covered Under Workers' Compensation in PA? - Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C.

From Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. - Are Pre-Existing Conditions Covered Under Workers' Compensation in PA? examines how Pennsylvania workers’ compensation law treats pre-existing conditions when a job aggravates, accelerates, or combines with an underlying injury or illness to cause disability. This episode explores the legal standards under the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act, including Section 301(c)(1), and explains why workers in New Castle, Lawrence County, Allegheny County, Beaver County, and Butler County may still qualify for benefits even if they were not in perfect health before a workplace injury. The discussion breaks down what it takes to prove that work materially worsened a pre-existing condition, from medical records and imaging studies to physician opinions and contemporaneous reporting. Listeners will hear how conditions such as degenerative disc disease, spinal stenosis, arthritis, herniated discs, knee injuries, rotator cuff tears, asthma, COPD, heart disease, depression, anxiety, migraines, and neurological disorders can become the focus of a valid Pennsylvania workers’ compensation claim when workplace duties or incidents change the course of the condition. This episode also covers the defenses insurers commonly raise, including arguments based on natural progression, delayed reporting, intervening causes, and claims that the disability was entirely pre-existing and unrelated to work. It explains how Workers’ Compensation Judges evaluate evidence, how Impairment Rating Evaluations may affect benefits after 104 weeks of total disability, and what injured workers may be able to recover through wage loss benefits, medical benefits, specific loss benefits, and vocational rehabilitation under Pennsylvania law. Featuring insight from Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. attorneys Joseph A. George and Lawrence M. Kelly, this podcast highlights the challenges injured workers face when insurers dispute the connection between job duties and increased disability. With service rooted in New Castle and extending throughout Western Pennsylvania, Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. shows how careful documentation, strong medical support, and timely notice under Section 311 can make all the difference when pursuing workers’ compensation benefits for the aggravation of a pre-existing condition. Luxenberg Garbett Kelly & George P.C. 315 N Mercer St, New Castle, PA 16101, United States (724) 658-8535 https://www.google.com/maps?cid=1349618312503922919
S5 · E124
Mar 10, 2026
5:07

What Is Strangulation in the First Degree Under PL § 121.13 in a Bronx Domestic Violence Case? - David Mejia Colgan

From David Mejia Colgan, Esq - What Is Strangulation in the First Degree Under PL § 121.13 in a Bronx Domestic Violence Case? explains how New York Penal Law § 121.13 applies to domestic violence arrests in the Bronx and why this charge is considered one of the most serious violent felonies under New York law. The episode explores how strangulation in the first degree is defined through criminal obstruction of breathing or blood circulation under PL § 121.11 and the requirement that the alleged conduct causes “serious physical injury” as defined in New York Penal Law § 10.00(10). Listeners will also learn how the Strangulation Prevention Act of 2010 reshaped prosecution strategies in New York and why allegations involving pressure to the throat, neck, nose, or mouth often lead to felony charges. The discussion breaks down the severe penalties tied to a class C violent felony, including mandatory determinate prison sentences ranging from 3.5 to 15 years under New York’s violent felony sentencing structure. It explains how prosecutors from the Bronx County District Attorney's Office evaluate evidence, including medical records, emergency room reports, and witness testimony, when attempting to prove intent to obstruct breathing and the existence of serious physical injury. The episode also clarifies why probation is generally unavailable without a reduction in charges and how prior violent felony convictions can increase sentencing exposure. Listeners will gain insight into how domestic violence cases involving strangulation move through the Bronx court system, beginning with arraignment at Bronx Criminal Court at 215 East 161st Street and potentially continuing through indictment by a Bronx County grand jury and proceedings in Bronx County Supreme Court. The conversation highlights how temporary orders of protection are issued under CPL § 530.12, how discovery obligations under CPL Article 245 affect the timeline of a case, and why cases may intersect with institutions like the Bronx Family Justice Center at 198 East 161st Street. The episode also discusses the role of the Bronx District Attorney’s Domestic Violence Bureau and its specialized Strangulation Initiative. Drawing on the perspective of Bronx criminal defense attorney David Mejia Colgan, Esq., a former prosecutor with the Bronx County District Attorney's Office and a graduate of New York University School of Law, the podcast outlines potential defense strategies in these cases. Topics include challenging the intent element, disputing whether injuries meet the legal definition of serious physical injury, raising self-defense under New York Penal Law § 35.15, and addressing credibility issues that often arise in domestic violence allegations. The episode also explains how orders of protection, potential criminal contempt charges under PL § 215.50 or PL § 215.51, and the broader criminal process can affect defendants in Bronx County, Westchester County, and throughout New York City. David Mejia Colgan, Esq 910 Grand Concourse Suite 1F, Bronx, NY 10451, United States (718) 484-8820 https://www.google.com/maps?cid=10458568621536558650
S5 · E123
Mar 9, 2026
6:58

T Visa for Labor Trafficking Victims - Rajat Shankar

From Shankar & Associates PC - T Visa for Labor Trafficking Victims explores how survivors of labor trafficking can seek immigration protection under federal immigration law in the United States. In this episode, Nassau County immigration attorney Rajat Shankar explains how the T visa, created under the Victims of Trafficking and Violence Protection Act, allows victims of severe human trafficking to remain in the country, obtain work authorization, and pursue a green card. Listeners will learn how labor trafficking occurs through force, fraud, or coercion and how survivors in New York, Long Island, and across the United States may qualify for this important form of relief. The discussion breaks down how U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) evaluates eligibility for T nonimmigrant status, including the requirement that applicants be physically present in the United States because of trafficking and demonstrate extreme hardship if removed. Rajat Shankar outlines when cooperation with law enforcement is required and when exceptions apply, particularly for minors or individuals facing severe trauma. The episode also explains the annual 5,000-visa cap and how applicants may still receive deferred action and employment authorization while waiting for approval. Listeners will also gain a clear understanding of the T visa application process, including how to file Form I-914, when to submit Form I-914 Supplement B for law enforcement declarations, and how Form I-765 can help applicants obtain an Employment Authorization Document (EAD) while their case is pending. The podcast discusses the types of evidence USCIS considers credible, such as personal statements, police reports, medical records, and documentation from agencies like the New York State Department of Labor. It also highlights how family members may receive protection through Form I-914 Supplement A, even if they are outside the United States. Finally, the episode explores the long-term pathway from T visa status to lawful permanent residence, including how survivors can apply for a green card after maintaining continuous presence in the United States. Rajat Shankar of Shankar & Associates PC, whose legal journey includes education at Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center and East Stroudsburg University, shares insights into supporting trafficking survivors and navigating complex immigration procedures. Resources such as the National Human Trafficking Hotline, operated by Polaris, and the Homeland Security Investigations Tip Line are also discussed to help victims find support and protection. Shankar & Associates PC 518 Plainview Rd, Plainview, NY 11803, United States (800) 461-1467 https://www.google.com/maps?cid=12579413868790841333
S5 · E122
Mar 6, 2026
6:10

What Are the Most Common Causes of Car Collisions? - Keetick L. Sanchez

From K L Sanchez Law Office, P.C. - What Are the Most Common Causes of Car Collisions? explores the real factors behind roadway accidents and why understanding them is essential for drivers navigating busy streets in Queens, New York City, and across New York. This episode examines how common dangers like distracted driving, speeding, impaired driving, and hazardous weather conditions contribute to serious crashes, injuries, and financial loss. Listeners gain practical insight into how awareness and responsible driving habits can help reduce accident risks on crowded urban roads. The discussion also highlights the unique challenges of driving in New York, where dense traffic, pedestrian activity, cyclists, and ongoing road construction create complex conditions for motorists. From sudden lane closures and poorly marked construction zones to aggressive driving in stop-and-go traffic, these factors increase the likelihood of collisions throughout New York City. Understanding how traffic patterns and roadway conditions contribute to accidents can help drivers stay alert and make safer decisions behind the wheel. Another key focus of the episode is human error, which remains the leading cause of vehicle crashes in New York. The conversation covers the consequences of texting while driving, unsafe lane changes, reckless speeding, and DUI-related driving, all of which significantly reduce reaction time and decision-making ability. The podcast also addresses how environmental hazards—such as snow, rain, fog, poor roadway maintenance, potholes, and limited street lighting—can further complicate driving conditions and increase accident risks. Finally, the episode introduces the legal perspective on collisions with insights connected to Queens car accident lawyers at K L Sanchez Law Office, P.C. Listeners learn about New York’s no-fault insurance system, including Personal Injury Protection (PIP) coverage, liability requirements, and the steps drivers should take after a crash. The story of Keetick L. Sanchez, a lifelong New Yorker and graduate of Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law School, adds context to the firm’s commitment to representing injured individuals throughout New York City and helping them navigate accident claims and pursue recovery after serious collisions. K L Sanchez Law Office, P.C. 37-06 82nd St #304, Jackson Heights, NY 11372, United States (646) 701-7990 https://www.google.com/maps?cid=2729652254808699760
S5 · E121
Mar 6, 2026
5:51

Chicago Property Division Lawyer - Caesar & Bender, LLP

From Caesar & Bender, LLP - Chicago Property Division Lawyer explores how property division works in Illinois divorces and why the outcome can have a lasting impact on your financial future. In this episode, we examine how courts in Chicago and Cook County approach dividing marital assets under the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (IMDMA), including the equitable distribution rules outlined in 750 ILCS 5/503. Listeners will gain insight into how judges evaluate fairness rather than applying a strict 50/50 formula when determining how property and debts are allocated during a divorce. The discussion highlights the statutory factors outlined in Section 503(d) of the IMDMA that courts consider when dividing property. From contributions to the marriage and dissipation of assets to economic circumstances and tax consequences, each factor plays a role in shaping the final outcome. We also look at how the Cook County Domestic Relations Division handles contested divorce matters and why preparation, financial disclosure, and clear documentation are essential when navigating property disputes. This episode also explains the difference between marital and non-marital property in Illinois and how commingling can affect asset classification. Topics include inheritances, pre-marital assets, real estate, retirement accounts, and complex financial holdings such as business interests, stock options, and executive compensation. The conversation also breaks down how retirement plans are divided using a Qualified Domestic Relations Order (QDRO) and how courts evaluate high-net-worth assets requiring professional valuations. Listeners will also learn about the professionals behind the firm. Michael Ian Bender, a co-founding partner and former Domestic Relations Judge for the Circuit Court of Cook County, and Molly E. Caesar, co-founding partner and Chicago family law attorney who has litigated cases up to the Illinois Supreme Court, share insights shaped by decades of experience. With backgrounds connected to institutions such as the University of Illinois Chicago School of Law, DePaul University College of Law, the Illinois Judges Foundation, and the Illinois Holocaust Museum & Education Center, their work at Caesar & Bender, LLP focuses on guiding clients through complex property division matters throughout Chicago and Cook County. Caesar & Bender, LLP 150 N Michigan Ave #2130, Chicago, IL 60601, United States (312) 236-1500 https://www.google.com/maps?cid=10482794179944044586
S5 · E120
Mar 6, 2026
4:08
41 of 178