#18 Peer Review, Reviewed: A Clos...

#18 Peer Review, Reviewed: A Closer Look at Scientific Publishing | WeAreSTS

WeAreSTS by Joe Cain

Episode notes

Most of us have heard of peer review, but how does it actually work? After more than a century, is it still fit for purpose? This episode explores the state of peer review in academic publishing. With guests from within the field, we hear what it means for researchers, publishers, and institutions like UCL. As the tide of open access publishing gains momentum and more research is made freely accessible, what will peer review look like in the future? How will academic publishing evolve more widely? In the future, can we still value anonymity over acknowledgement of reviewers?

In this episode, Olivia Kehoe explores the peer review process with a critical eye, discussing how other trends in publishing, such as open access and data publishing, soon might re-shape activities such as peer review. She highlights two alternatives to the current sy ... 

Read more
Keywords
uclpressPublishingjournalsPCIpeerreviewopenaccessacademicpublishingmonographsqualitycontrolscientificpublishingdatapublishingopenpeerreviewreviewernumbertwopeercommunitiesinuclopenenvironment