Discussing the scientific controversy surrounding the Linear No-Threshold (LNT) model of radiation protection, which posits that any amount of radiation exposure, no matter how small, increases cancer risk. Critically, several articles present evidence supporting the radiation hormesis hypothesis, a contrasting model suggesting that low doses of radiation, often comparable to or slightly exceeding natural background levels, can actually be beneficial or protective, demonstrating a biphasic dose-response relationship. This evidence is drawn from epidemiological studies in high natural background radiation areas (e.g., Ramsar, Iran, and Kerala, India), which frequently show no significant increase in cancer or mortality, and sometimes suggest a decrease. Furthermore, experimental data ...