Case Summary:

The Case arises from a Texas murder trial in which the judge ordered defendant David Asa Villarreal not to discuss his ongoing testimony with his lawyers during a 24‑hour overnight recess between direct and cross‑examination, and again during a later seven‑minute break in cross. Villarreal, the only defense witness and central to a self‑defense theory, was thus unable to confer with counsel about his testimony at a critical stage of trial; after he was convicted and sentenced to sixty years, the state appellate courts upheld the conviction and concluded that the no‑conferral order did not violate his Sixth Amendment right to counsel because it barred only discussion of his testimony, not other topics. The issue before the Supreme Court was whether a trial judge violates a criminal defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel b ...