What the early evolutionists got wrong

Ten years after the publication of Charles Darwin's "The Origin of Species...", there were two discoveries that though unknown at the time (1869) that in retrospect demonstrated that the conclusions drawn from the dedicated work of Darwin were contrary to the designs in Nature.

Almost before the dust had settled from Darwin's publication in 1859, the Swiss chemist Friedrich Miescher isolated what he called "nuclein", which we know today as DNA, which turned out to be the blueprint for the physical forms of every living organism, also in 1869, the Russian chemist Dmitri Mendeleev received in a dream/vision The Periodic Table of Elements.

The Periodic Table is the primary source of all that powers our civilization, DNA continues to power our understanding of all organisms.

There are some concepts that are very familiar to anyone who is involved in the designing and building of products or systems, these concepts may not be very apparent to others regardless of their level of education.

Every designer and builder is familiar with RE-USABILITY and SCOPE.

Possibly due to the lack of knowledge of the use of "nuclein" in all life forms, it appears that the early framers of our current Theory of Evolution did not consider that possibly that like the protons, neutrons and electrons that are part of every element, that there may have been building blocks to Life that were reused.

Just as we re-use computer chips or the internal combustion engine in diverse machines, as explained more fully in book "The ESIS - Life's Logic Module", there is significant evidence that many of the "components" of Life are re-used, so the evidence of DNA being the "blueprint" of Life, there needed to be some investigation into whether what was being revealed was not organisms being "derived" from others but in fact could be examples of design, reusing previously developed models.

One clear example of intelligently defined scope, is from the observed difference in the DNA between humans and chimpanzees or the great apes, where even though there is great similarity and it is currently accepted that one was "derived" from the other, the intelligently defined "scope" ensures that (in spite of the work of all manners of scientists) "cross-breeding" is not feasible.

So the lack of accounting for intelligent design which would undoubtedly make use of re-usability and scope, we instead have these assertions of all life having descended from one ancestor based on random mutations with Natural Selection being the filter for all the perfection that is observable in Nature, this despite the fact that none of the literally millions of "inter species or missing links" have been found either in the archaeological record or anywhere currently in Nature.