Note sull'episodio
What makes a curse unethical, and who gets to decide? In this episode of Salt & Sovereignty, Ashley explores curses, baneful magic, consent, protection, anger, justice, and personal responsibility through the complicated lens of witchcraft ethics.
Ashley begins with something she has never tried to hide or soften: she has cursed someone before, she believed the working was justified, and she still stands by that decision. From there, the conversation moves beyond whether curses are simply “good” or “bad” and into the much harder questions underneath magical ethics.
In this episode:
- Ashley shares the story of a mirror curse she performed and why she considers it both baneful and ultimately healing
- We explore the long history of curses, bindings, and defixiones in ancient Greek and Roman magical practice
- Ashley examines the Wiccan Rede, the Threefold Law, and why “harm none” is not a universal rule of witchcraft
- We look at consent, protection, revenge, justice, return-to-sender work, and the uncomfortable overlap between them
- Ashley reflects on anger, survivorhood, spiritual darkness, and the pressure to sanitize difficult emotions
- We question whether “light” magic is automatically ethical and whether “dark” magic deserves the assumptions placed upon it
This is not an argument that curses are good, or that everyone should practice baneful magic. It is a reflection on what happens when spiritual ethics collide with real human lives, where harm, consent, protection, intention, and consequence are rarely as simple as we want them to be.
If you have ever wondered where your magical ethics came from, what responsibility means inside your practice, or whether darkness and light are really useful moral categories at all, this episode is an invitation to become curious before becoming certain.