May It Please The Internet
Stagione 1
Taylor Swift & Taylor's Version: An Intro to Copyright Law
Down Goes Thotsbay
How Do I Talk To An Attorney, How Do I Hire An Attorney, and What Should I Be Asking?
di John Di Giacomo & Eric Misterovich
This episode focuses on Copyright law in music and entertainment. John and Eric discuss Taylor Swift's music and the significance of "Taylor's Version" on download and streaming platforms. There is also some time dedicated to John's love of the Insane Clown Posse. First – intro into copyright law – few quick definitions then pull it together What is a copyright – type of IP that protects original works of authorship the moment an author fixes the work in a tangible medium of expression. What is a work – picture, movie, musical recording, book, architecture, code, etc What are copyright rights – Reproduce the work Distribute copies of the work Perform the work publicly Make derivative work Perform copyrighted sound recordings by means of a digital audio transmission Display the work Explain copyright as bundle of sticks Bring it all together. Second, copyrights in music/albums There are always two copyrights at issue: the music itself/lyrics and the musical recording. Artist usually owns the music/lyrics Record label owns the recording Gives both rights in the music, need both approval for licensing, etc Now to Taylor Big Machine Records owned Taylor’s musical recordings That entity was sold to Scooter Braun, manager of many famous groups He sold it to a private equity firm, estimates are $300 million This would give this PE firm rights to control that music Taylor didn’t like this and said fuck you Contract Law Taylor’s contracts with Big Machine Records gave her re-recording rights after 2 years. So this allows her to re-record the songs But isn’t that infringing on the PE firm’s rights? NO Copyright law, specifically 17 USC 114 The exclusive rights of the owner of copyright in a sound recording under clauses (1) and (2) of section 106 do not extend to the making or duplication of another sound recording that consists entirely of an independent fixation of other sounds, even though such sounds imitate or simulate those in the copyrighted sound recording. So this means Taylor can make the same song (she owns the music and lyrics) and record it and it is NOT infringement And that is exactly she did. She re-recorded 4 albums and you will see they are all called “Taylor’s Version” on Spotify/Apple music Boss move May It Please The Internet is a podcast brought to you by REVISIONLEGAL.com
John Di Giacomo and Eric Misterovich share how Revision Legal took down thotsbay.com, the process, the push back, and the positive results. Short Story: Through a copyright infringement lawsuit, we were able to have a haven for leaked paid adult content taken down. What was Thotsbay? Explanation of forums How people gained “points” upvotes etc Number of people impacted by this website – hundreds of thousands of users What we did Filed a lawsuit in the ND IL for copyright infringement The case for copyright infringement is very clear We conduct discovery Subpoenas to ad networks, paypal, registrars We are able to find the people behind the websites, but they reside overseas Not able to freeze a substantial amount of money, they switched into only accepting bitcoin shortly after the lawsuit began We obtain a default judgment That judgment requires third parties to act This required us to enforce the judgment with Tucows / Verisign Shortly thereafter, the site moved to a specific country code registrar outside the US, but able to convince them to shut down the site as well What happened next Subscription bomb, other bad actions Sites give up, but we keep getting notices that the site is back, not entirely clear at this point Ton of support from those impacted, positive end Next steps Fight isn’t over Continuing our investigation Other sites are in the cross hairs May It Please The Internet is a podcast brought by RevisionLegal.com, lawyers who represent businesses who make money online.
Christopher Carol, Attorney at Revision Legal joins Eric Misterovich to talk about taking the stress away from hiring an attorney. They cover how to know it's time to seek legal assistance, how to go about hiring an attorney, what to ask during the initial meeting, and making your decision. In this episode you will learn how to avoid surprises, gauge experience and responsiveness, and build mutual trust with reasonable expectations. May It Please The Internet is a podcast brought by RevisionLegal.com
Eric is joined by Chris Carol, Associate Attorney at Revision Legal. Chris shares his prior experience as in-house corporate legal counsel for a variety of different entrepreneurs throughout his career and how he applies this to his work with Revision Legal. Is Your E-commerce Business Ready for In-House Counsel? Episode Outline: Intro • Welcome to May it Please the Internet • Intro to Chris ◦ Chris joined in 2021, previous experience working in-house ◦ Chris, explain who you are, past experience in general terms, etc. • Topic ◦ Here today to talk about whether your eCommerce business is ready for in-house counsel ◦ What is in-house counsel and what do they do? ▪ Oversight over legal issues for entire business • Handle certain issues for the business ◦ Internal corporate matters ◦ Contracting ◦ Some employment ◦ Regulatory / licensing issues • Outsource and work with outside counsel for other matters ◦ Litigation ◦ IP ◦ Employment ◦ Tax ◦ Property ▪ Quasi-business advisor • Identify risk • Ask tough questions • Generally kill dreams (but just playing devil’s advocate) ▪ The main point is that you have someone with legal training in the room, part of the planning process, and hearing the input/issues raised by various departments within the company ◦ Different types of “in-house” counsel ▪ Standard is hiring an attorney and putting them on the payroll • This is right for certain types of businesses ◦ VC firm, highly regulated industries, or big enough where legal is a constant issue ▪ But “in house” can be a good fit even for businesses that don’t fall into those categories, but it would be at a smaller scale • Fractional in-house or “outsourced in-house” ◦ What it really means is having a regular and constant legal voice in the business, on whatever scale makes sense ◦ We do this in a number of ways ▪ Attend certain meetings ▪ Regular weekly, bi-weekly, or monthly meetings ▪ Being a part of a company’s Teams/ Slack channel ▪ Attend company retreats • What are the benefits? ◦ We touched on this already, but its about having that voice in the room ◦ Yes, we may identify more problems than a true risk-taker, but we can also save time ▪ If you come up with a plan for doing a massive online sweepstakes as a central marketing effort, spend a bunch of time and money, then at the last minute say, we need to run this by legal, you may have wasted a bunch of time ▪ Of course cost is a concern, but in my experience, the problem with legal fees is usually the unpredictable nature, not the cost itself. ▪ If you can find a predictable budget, even flat fees, then this can work ▪ Wrap it up • In house essential for some businesses • Can benefit all businesses and the cost can be made predictable • Having that different voice in the room can save time May It Please The Internet is a podcast brought to you by REVISIONLEGAL.COM
Handling Legal Problems on Amazon Actions by Amazon competitors Describe the problem Specific types of problems False infringement notices False re-categorization Hijacking listings How to handle them Demand letters Litigation Types of claims Abuse of the DMCA Tortious interference Unfair competition/deceptive trade practices Actions involving Amazon Describe the problem Specific types of problems Suspensions Terminations IP infringement How to handle them Arbitration under BSA Litigation for IP claims "May It Please The Internet" is a podcast brought to you by: Revision Legal
Talking Trademarks – 5 Things Every Business Owner Should Know 1. What are Trademarks? The term “trademark” includes any word, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof— (1) used by a person, or (2) which a person has a bona fide intention to use in commerce and applies to register on the principal register established by this chapter, to identify and distinguish his or her goods, including a unique product, from those manufactured or sold by others and to indicate the source of the goods, even if that source is unknown. 2. What is the Purpose of Trademarks? Protect consumers - Coffee example Value to rights holder 3. Are some Trademarks Better than Others? Yes, not all created equal i. Fanciful ii. Arbitrary iii. Suggestive iv. Descriptive Things to avoid i. descriptive ii. geography iii. surnames iv. foreign languages 4. How Close is too Close to Another Trademark Need to understand likelihood of confusion test Very flexible Not strict How close are the two marks - Slight change in spelling not enough How close are the Goods/services, sophistication of consumer, trade channels, etc 5. Do I Need to Register a Trademark to have one? NO Use in commerce Benefits of registration Bonus – why hire an attorney for a TM? Single filings, with some study, not the end of the world to do yourself But these rights last forever (in theory), if there is any complexity at all, get advice Attorneys can help with future plans, contingent plans, scope of your registrations, and practical advise Worthy investment "May It Please The Internet" is a podcast brought to you by: RevisionLegal.com
APA Series Reps and Warranties What are they – Promises General overview Walk through some examples How people should be reviewing these What happens if they are not true Disclosure schedules! What are these How do they work What do they look like What happens if you breach these promises Explain connection to indemnification Fundamental v general reps Baskets and caps Parting Shot Get your operating agreement done. Do it. Make it a priority. You may not use it, but its nice to have something in place. May It Please The Internet is a podcast brought to you by RevisionLegal.com
How to Think About Litigation Had a client ask me, will I win? And it just made me think about the incredible disconnect between what people think a lawsuit is about and what a lawsuit it really about. Basics of litigation – big picture Long, slow, expensive Not great way to solve a problem Either a last resort or a problem so big that it cannot wait or injunctive relief Outside pressures play a big role Loss of profits, waiting on money, financing, online listings, etc. Personal or business decisions, selling the business, new projects, new hires, etc. Procedure Complaint, summons Answer/MTD Creating factual issues good for P bad for D Discovery Summary J Trial Collections So the question is not “will I win” Its balancing all of these factors, determining whether it is worth the investment, the odds of success, the consequences of losing, peace of mind, loss of production, etc May It Please The Internet is a podcast brought to you by: RevisionLegal.com
Mini-APA Series: Purchase Price and Closing Last week, we covered the basics what exactly is an APA; how is it different than equity, the parties to the agreement, what you are selling, what you are not selling. This week we want to talk about the fun stuff: Purchase Price and Closing Purchase Price Different ways to describe it, one number, one number plus other payments later, a multiple of SDE, etc. Get into SDE in a bit First want to make sure you confirm the number is correct and when does it get paid Escrow/release of escrow Deferred payments Hold back Deferred Payment Stabilization payments Earn Out Payments Other deferred payment issues When are deferred payments made? Performance based Earn out payments What is the calculation Are there caps on things like operational overhead? Do you have access to books and records to confirm performance targets Can these be used for set off? Inventory Payment When is this paid All types of options Paid in full % of estimate then true up Consignment Inventory estimate/reconciliation process Seller estimates pre closing Buyer determines final post closing Must have ability to object to post closing When is reconciled amount paid Net working capital adjustments Parting Shot – If you are about to be in a lawsuit, or maybe in a lawsuit, don’t email everyone in the world about it. Those are all discoverable. If a lawsuit is possible, phone calls only. Limit emails to attorneys. Don’t forward your attorney’s emails to other people! ***May It Please The Internet is a podcast brought to you by RevisionLegal.com, lawyers who represent businesses who make money online.
Stolen Digital Assets! Opening: general chat about digital assets, how they can move, how they can be stolen, people forgetting bitcoin wallet passwords, etc. This used to be about domain name Revision Legal past experience in litigating stolen domain name issues ACPA/CFAA/UDRP Damages Procedure/Jurisdiction Continuing the NFT train – stolen NFT is the newest rage Recent lawsuit – Armijo v OpenSea and Yuga Labs (BAYC) – District of NV FACTS Nov 2021, Jan 2022, P bought 3 BAYC/MAYC for total of about 80 ETH (about 300k) Feb 2022, he wants to trade the MAYC for some “Cool Cats” NFTs He goes on a discord channel and finds a willing trade partner P alleges a third party trading service was needed to complete the trade, P wanted to use NFT Trader.io, other side agrees. “A few minutes” after agreeing to the trade, the other side says he uploaded the Cool Cats to the website, and he just needs P to upload the MAYCs and complete the transaction. Other side sends P a link to the NFT Trader website. P thought it was the real website, it wasn’t He uploads, and clicks to approve the transfer, nothing happens, he clicks multiple times more, then he notices his ETH in his wallet is lower than expected, he checks the wallet, and BAYC and MAYC are gone. Turns out the website was fake, every time he clicked to complete the transaction, he was allowing access to his wallet He tries to tell Open Sea in order to prevent the re-sale, does the same on discord, reaches out to BAYC on discord, they tell him sorry and will try to help with Open Sea 4 hours after they are stolen, they are all re-sold on open sea It appears they were then later sold on LooksRare New owners will not give them back unless they are paid what they lost Complaint goes on to detail many other similar situations, complains of lack of gov regulations CAUSES OF ACTION Alleges OpenSeas grew too fast, not sufficient security protocols, same w LooksRare, says BAYC doesn’t do anything to prevent this Negligence as to OS and LR – not maintaining the database for stolen items, not sufficient customer service Points to media interviews about OS admitting they have an “obligation” as to security Negligence as to BAYC – not monitoring the community for stolen items Negligent supervision and training and negligent hiring as to OS and LR Discuss SIM SWAP cases What is a sim swap How do they happen Causes of action Arbitration "May It Please The Internet" is a podcast brought to you by: RevisionLegal.com, lawyers who represent businesses who make money online.