LETRS: Weasels or Engery Efficien...

LETRS: Weasels or Engery Efficient Light Bubls

The Reading Instruction Show di Dr. Andy Johnson
S23 · E6
20 lug 2024
21:20

Note sull'episodio

This podcast examines Language Essentials for Teachers of Reading and Special (Lexia) or LETRS. I wanted to find the “reliable, trustworthy, and valid evidence” that “has demonstrated” that LETRS had “a record of success in increasing students' reading competency in the areas of phonological and phonemic awareness, phonics, vocabulary development, reading fluency, and reading comprehension”. I was eager to start reading all the research showing that LETRS professional development had a demonstrated record of success in increasing students’ reading competency. Specifically, I was looking for three things:

1. A vast, interdisciplinary body of scientifically-based research linking LETRS to improved teaching performance.

2. A vast, interdisciplinary body of scientifically-based research linking LETRS to improved student reading outcomes.

3. A vast, interdisciplinary body of scientifically-based research providing evidence that LETRS was more effective than other types of professional development in improving teacher performance or student reading outcomes.

Parole chiave

reading
reading instruction
andy johnson
peer reviewed research
peer reviewed reading research
national reading panel
scientifically based research
scientifically based reading research
teaching reading
teacher professionalism
teacher professional development
teacher preparation
literacy
reading research
science of reading
emily hanford
balanced literacy
reading science
the reading league
LETRS