Attorneys On Retainer | Podcast in RSS.com

Attorneys On Retainer

Attorneys On Retainer

di The Attorneys For Freedom Law Firm

Educazione Governo

AOR x AHT Breakdown the Deadly In-N-Out Incident

An analysis of the self-defense actions taken during an active shooter event at an In-N-Out. This breakdown examines the events where bystanders intervened to stop a threat. We review the specific actions taken by those involved to neutralize the danger, offering a clearer understanding of how civilian responses can impact the outcome of high-stress situations. Alongside the physical response, we provide a legal analysis of self-defense claims in this context. You will gain a perspective on how the law applies to bystander intervention. By reviewing the available footage, we can better understand the tactical analysis of the situation and the critical decisions made under pressure.

FEDERAL JUDGE RULES: NFA Silencer Registration Unconstitutional?

Huge NFA Court Ruling: Silencer Shop Foundation v. ATF Explained The National Firearms Act just took a massive hit. Here is what the monumental federal ruling in Silencer Shop Foundation v. ATF means for gun owners, suppressors, and NFA paperwork. About This Video: Criminal defense attorney Rachel Moss breaks down the recent federal court decision that strikes down overbearing NFA filing regulations, fingerprinting, and registration requirements for untaxed firearms. Learn how the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" of 2025 effectively stripped the ATF of its regulatory authority under the taxing clause. We cover exactly how the court ruled, why the government's taxing power no longer applies to these items, and which states and individuals are protected under this permanent injunction. This is a historic victory against government overreach and a massive step toward dismantling the NFA.

AOR's Critique Of USCCA LAW!

Is the newly announced USCCA Law a legitimate self-defense law firm, or an elaborate marketing ploy? In this video, attorneys Andy Marcantel and Marc Victor peel back the layers on USCCA’s latest announcement. What they found in the fine print will leave you speechless... In this video, we investigate: What type of law are the USCCA Law lawyers practicing? Who is determining your coverage? How can one legal maneuver instantly strip your coverage? Who answers the phone in your darkest hour and are your words protected?

AOR Teams Up With Achilles Heel Tactical

Big news! Attorneys On Retainer is teaming up with Achilles Heel Tactical, and as an AOR client, their firearms training is now yours. Responsible gun ownership does not stop at carrying. It means being competent with the firearm you own, and being ready for the moment everything is on the line. In an exclusive sit-down, Andy Marcantel, Partner and Managing Criminal Defense Attorney at Attorneys For Freedom Law Firm, joins Rick Crawley, CEO and Chief Instructor of Achilles Heel Tactical, to break down what this collaboration puts in your hands. Rick founded Achilles Heel Tactical in 2017 after an honorable separation from the Marine Corps, where he served as a Squad Leader and Scout Sniper Team Leader across three deployments, followed by a career in law enforcement as a firearms instructor and SWAT team member.

Defeating Hawaii's Anti-Gun "Vampire Rule" Interview With Attorney Alan Beck

In this professional legal analysis, Criminal Defense Attorney Andy Marcantel and President & Managing Partner Marc J. Victor sit down with Second Amendment Attorney Alan Beck to discuss a major constitutional ruling regarding concealed carry rights. Fresh off his victory at the United States Supreme Court, Alan breaks down the complexities of Wolford v. Lopez and Hawaii’s attempt to bypass the Bruen decision. Hawaii, along with states like California, New York, Maryland, and New Jersey, attempted to enforce a "vampire rule," a law making it a crime for citizens with a lawful concealed carry permit to enter private businesses open to the public (like grocery stores or gas stations) without explicit, affirmative consent from the property owner. This video provides a direct legal breakdown with no deviation from the core constitutional issues, examining the historical analogues used by the courts, the surprising split in the dissenting opinions (including Justice Jackson's pivot to property rights), and what this landmark decision means for gun owners nationwide.

BIG ANNOUNCEMENT + Self Defense Academy LIVE from GOALS 2026

AFF attorneys Andy Marcantel and Joey Hamby will be LIVE at GOALS 2026 Room 309, Saturday, August 1 at 11 AM CT. They have an announcement that adds even more value to your AOR membership. Plus, they're hosting Self Defense Academy Live: a full breakdown of a hypothetical self-defense situation, from the moment it happens through the legal aftermath. See how real attorneys think through the decisions that could decide your freedom.

THE UPS DRIVER BITES BACK! Dog Attacks and Self-Defense Law

A viral video shows a UPS delivery driver defending himself against a charging dog by throwing a customer's package at it. But was this a legally justified act of self-defense? Attorneys Andy Marcantel and Joey Hamby from the Attorneys for Freedom Law Firm break down the viral footage to analyze the legalities of the driver's actions. They discuss the critical differences between "ordinary" and "deadly" physical force, what legal rights you have when defending yourself against an aggressive animal, and the potential criminal liabilities for negligent dog owners. The attorneys also evaluate the heated confrontation that takes place immediately after the attack between the driver and the dog owner, explaining the "Mere Words Doctrine" and how your actions post-incident can impact your legal standing.

WAS DEADLY FORCE JUSTIFIED? Analyzing the Florida Walmart Shooting

Was this fatal parking space dispute a valid case of self-defense law? Attorneys analyze the North Lauderdale shooting facts. Attorneys Andy Marcantel and Joey Hamby from Attorneys for Freedom break down the recent deadly shooting in North Lauderdale, Florida. This discussion is intended for those seeking to understand the legal thresholds required to claim self-defense when a confrontation escalates to lethal force. By examining the specific details of this parking space dispute, viewers will learn how attorneys evaluate the reasonableness of a shooter's actions. The conversation highlights the critical factors that separate a justified deadly shooting analysis from potential criminal liability under Florida statutes. Understanding these nuances is essential for anyone interested in the practical application of legal self-defense standards in real-world scenarios.

Karmelo Anthony Convicted: Self-Defense Analysis, Bad Parenting & The Appellate Process

In this highly requested follow-up video, criminal defense attorneys Andy Marcantel and Marc Victor from the Attorneys For Freedom Law Firm break down the recent first-degree murder conviction of Karmelo Anthony and the 35-year sentence that followed. As lawyers in the trenches of self-defense litigation, Andy and Marc provide a unique, post-trial analysis of this controversial case. They detail why this incident fails the basic proportionality test for self-defense, the catastrophic impact of the defendant’s spontaneous statements to police, and the devastating trial testimony from a defense witness that triggered the "aggressor doctrine." The discussion also explores the crucial next steps in the legal system: the appellate process. They analyze the high-profile pro bono team taking over the appeal, the legal framework of Batson challenges during jury selection, and the difficult Strickland standard for proving ineffective assistance of counsel. Finally, they discuss the severe lack of parental support at sentencing, why "bad parenting" is a vital mitigating factor in criminal law, and the fundamental importance of defending constitutional rights in unpopular cases.

WE CALLED IT! Big Brother is Watching: Geofence Warrants & Your Fourth Amendment Rights

In today’s video, criminal defense attorneys Joey Hamby and Howard Snader from Attorneys For Freedom sit down with digital forensic expert Michele Bush with Loehrs Forensics to discuss a massive Fourth Amendment issue recently argued before the Supreme Court: Chatrie v. United States. Did you know that the government can search through millions of Google accounts without anyone’s knowledge or consent? We dive deep into a 2019 bank robbery case out of Midlothian, Virginia, where law enforcement used a “geofence warrant” to compel Google to search its massive Sensorvault database scanning hundreds of millions of innocent users just to find one suspect. We break down the technical and constitutional realities of this alarming trend, often referred to as “lazy police work,” and what it means for your digital privacy today. What’s In This Video? Geofence Warrants Explained: How law enforcement draws a virtual fence to capture the location data of innocent bystanders. The Tech Divide: How different tech giants, specifically Google and Apple, store your location data and respond to government requests. Privacy vs. Property: The two competing schools of constitutional thought at the Supreme Court regarding whether your digital data is actually your property. The Slippery Slope: Why allowing warrantless searches of location data could eventually lead to the government searching your personal Gmail, calendar, and photos. Protecting Yourself: Practical steps you can take to manage your location data and limit digital exposure in today’s tech-heavy world. Protect Your Freedoms We are the law firm that backs the Attorneys on Retainer program. We aren't just about the Second Amendment; we are about defending all of your Constitutional freedoms against government overreach.

1 di 42