The Forty-Six Point Spread: Why Your Outcome Depends on Who You Get, Who Represents You, and Where You Live
Administrative Remedies di Gwendolyn Savitz and Marc Roark
Note sull'episodio
A 2017 GAO study found that Social Security disability outcomes could swing by forty-six percentage points based solely on which ALJ heard the case. Same claimant, same record, same hearing office, different judge. Individual ALJ approval rates range from under ten percent to over ninety. That's not noise — it's the system.
In this episode — the first of a three-part series on how agencies actually produce outcomes — Gwen and Marc step outside the hearing room and examine the three variables that shape results before a single question gets asked:
- Judge assignment: Random allocation protects against selective routing, but paired with forty-six points of variation, it produces something that looks like a lottery. The system chose neutrality over consistency — and consistency doesn't get recovered downstream. ...
Parole chiave
administrative lawadjudicationSocial Security disabilityAdministrative law judges (ALJs)Combining investigative and adjudicative functionsdisability approval rates