S07 E09: Gilmore versus Blue Care...

S07 E09: Gilmore versus Blue Care: A hankering for sex

Explícito
WhyWork Podcast por Alan Girle, Trajce Cvetkovski, & Sara Pazell
T7 · E9
17 mar 2025
22:06

Notas del episodio

Season 07 Episode 09: Gilmore versus Blue Care: A hankering for sex

WARNING: This episode includes discussion on a workplace sexual assault – we advise listener discretion.

Alan introduces the case, Gilmore versus Blue Care, a community home care provider. In this case, a personal carer submitted her claim against her employer because of her report of sexual assault when providing daily living support to older men living in a group home. These men each had various forms of mental health disorders and daily living support needs, necessitating their care provision. However, Alan paints the scenario of collective vulnerability when a female worker is left to work solo in a home with men. He extends the discussion on sexuality and sexual drives, at any age.

“We are the only workplace podcast to descend into conversations on sex,” remarks Trajce. “We do more than descend – we embrace this,” says Sara. She continues, “I’ve got an itch, a hankering for sex.” Trajce jests, “When I am hankering, I yearn for a marshmallow or a burger.” “Some people hanker for very different things, Trajce,” Sara educates. Alan jibes, “You’re safe with Trajce as long as you offer an all-you-can-eat buffet!” and advises “If you’re an employer, imagining that no one seeks sex in your workplace or your care facility, you’re misled.”

Palabras clave

work health safety law
human factors
work heath law
mental health
caselaw
case law
sex
work health safety
work related mental health disorders
work health
aged care
assault
sexual assault
sexual drives