Host 1 should be the visionary advocate explaining why the current Ebola response needs a trusted community-based front door.

Host 2 should be the sceptical public-health expert asking difficult questions about evidence, ethics, privacy, feasibility, false alarms, regulatory approval, and whether AI can safely support Ebola triage.

The debate should be balanced, credible, emotional, and intellectually strong. It should not sound like advertising. It should gradually move from scepticism to conditional support for a pilot.

Structure the audio debate like this:

1. Opening hook: “What if Ebola is not spreading only because of the virus, but because fear is moving faster than trust?”
2. Explain the DR Congo challenge.
3. Explain why a centralised hospital-based response is insufficient when people hide or travel. ...