Nature Refuting/Invalidating Darwinism - The splash tetra

Nature is purposeful defying the assertions of Darwinism. Almost before the dust had settled from Darwin's publication in 1859, the Swiss chemist Friedrich Miescher isolated what he called "nuclein", which we know today as DNA, which turned out to be the blueprint for the physical forms of every living organism, also in 1869, the Russian chemist Dmitri Mendeleev received in a dream/vision The Periodic Table of Elements.

In retrospect we can now recognize the intelligence and the re-usability of protons, neutrons and electrons constituting the major part of every element and nuclein/DNA as the blueprint for the physical makeup and characteristics of every living organism.

The insistence in Darwinism that the evolution of all life forms has no intelligent or logical foundation or intelligent drivers for any development is now the Achilles heel that leads to its eventual abandonment (in spite of now asserting that coevolution is somehow related to random mutation and Natural Selection as well as Darwin predicted certain activities, somehow even associating predictability with random!), this is because not only are there no “missing links” which based on the primary assertions should actually outnumber all the “perfect mutants” in Nature, it also flies in the face of the prevalence of intelligent systems within every organism as well as the perfectly matching intrinsic intelligence (instincts) that directs the activities of every plant and animal.

The obvious intrinsic intelligence that directs the male and female splash tetras to communicate and synchronize repeated leaping out of water and using their specially designed attributes to attach to leaves, then depositing the next generation in an environment that is safe from being viewed as stationary fish food for other inhabitants of their aquatic home, and the intelligence that directs the parent to keep the fertilized eggs moist until the eggs produce the next generation so that they have a better chance of survival, shows the type of “programming” that is so advanced, that it serves to completely refute any notion of “random” as well as a massive sign to any who are open minded of purposeful design with intelligence and benevolence for a specific specie.

As with the sensory system and intelligence, what is on display with this remarkable activity is just the proof of superbly elegant and purposeful design implemented to enable the activities demonstrated.