Welcome to the Wednesday edition of “It’s Another Day with Jim and Bill”. President Trump’s immunity hearing in DC should be a slam dunk. They’re considering if presidents…not just President Trump…should be immune from prosecution for decisions of national security that are made while holding office. But two of the three judges are Biden appointees and the other a Bush appointee. And based on the questioning in yesterday's hearing, it seems that he is in front of a very partisan judiciary. Should this question even be under consideration by a court at this level? Shouldn’t something of this importance, that would seem to have significant Constitutional significance, be something that only Congress can rule on? Why are three individuals in robes deciding the constitutionality of Presidential immunity? Should they rule against immunity, won’t this  ...