BSPE Legal Marketing Podcast

BSPE Legal Marketing Podcast

por Viktoria Altman

Temporada 5

Special Assessments: What Buyers Should Check Before Signing - Natalia A. Sishodia

From Sishodia PLLC - Special Assessments: What Buyers Should Check Before Signing explains what New York and NYC property buyers need to know about hidden ownership costs before committing to a real estate purchase. This episode explores how special assessments can come from local governments, co-op boards, condo associations, or HOAs, and why buyers should look beyond the purchase price, property taxes, maintenance fees, and common charges before signing a contract. The discussion breaks down the two major types of assessments: municipal and governmental assessments, including Special Assessment Districts, and private assessments imposed by condominiums, co-ops, and homeowners’ associations. Listeners will learn how projects such as sewer lines, road paving, sidewalks, street lighting, emergency repairs, roof replacements, elevator modernizations, boiler or HVAC overhauls, and window replacements can lead to significant costs for owners. Sishodia PLLC also highlights New York City-specific concerns such as Local Law 11, the Façade Inspection & Safety Program, Qualified Exterior Wall Inspector reports, Department of Buildings filings, SWARMP designations, unsafe façade findings, sidewalk sheds, DOB fines, reserve fund issues, operating deficits, and the difference between proposed and confirmed special assessments. The episode explains how these details can affect negotiations, seller payment obligations, purchase price reductions, closing credits, and escrow arrangements. Featuring insight connected to NYC real estate lawyer Natalia Sishodia, Esq., LL.M., this episode also covers legal protections and risks under the Property Condition Disclosure Act, fraud or misrepresentation claims, breach of contract issues, estoppel certificates, and possible claims against an association. For buyers, sellers, investors, domestic and international clients, high-net-worth individuals, and families connected across Europe, Asia, and North America, Sishodia PLLC offers guidance on navigating New York real estate transactions with clarity before hidden costs become expensive surprises. Sishodia PLLC 600 3rd Ave 2nd floor, New York, NY 10016, United States (833) 616-4646 https://www.google.com/maps?cid=12450537318741950980

Roanoke Virginia Attorney John P. Fishwick Jr. - John P. Fishwick Jr.

From Fishwick & Associates PLC - Roanoke Virginia Attorney John P. Fishwick Jr. | Fishwick & Associates PLC explores the career, courtroom experience, and national legal presence of John P. Fishwick Jr., a former United States Attorney for the Western District of Virginia. Based in Roanoke, Virginia, this episode highlights how his leadership role within the federal system shaped his approach to handling serious personal injury and federal criminal cases across Virginia. Listeners will gain insight into how John P. Fishwick Jr.’s background—including his time working alongside federal agencies and litigating complex cases—now informs his representation of clients facing high-stakes legal challenges. The discussion also touches on his recognition by organizations such as Virginia Super Lawyers, Best Lawyers of America, Virginia Business Magazine’s Legal Elite, and the Virginia 500 Power List, along with his AV Preeminent rating from Martindale-Hubbell. The episode also explores Fishwick’s presence in the national media, with appearances on NewsNation, CNN, MSNBC, Fox Business News, and Sinclair Broadcasting, as well as citations in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, and The Washington Examiner. These moments underscore his role in shaping public understanding of major legal developments while reinforcing the depth he brings to each case at Fishwick & Associates PLC. Finally, the podcast dives into his academic and professional journey—from Harvard College to Washington and Lee University School of Law, and his early clerkship with Chief Judge James C. Turk—to his ongoing involvement with organizations like the Roanoke Bar Association, Virginia Bar Association, Virginia Trial Lawyers Association, and The Ted Dalton American Inn of Court. It paints a full picture of a Roanoke native whose experience across the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit and the United States Supreme Court continues to influence clients throughout Virginia. Fishwick & Associates PLC 30 Franklin Rd SW Ste 700, Roanoke, VA 24011, United States (540) 345 5890 https://www.google.com/maps?cid=10040635858459830700

Strangulation Charges in Bronx Domestic Violence Cases - David Mejia Colgan

From David Mejia Colgan, Esq. - Strangulation Charges in Bronx Domestic Violence Cases explores how New York law treats strangulation and obstruction of breathing allegations under Penal Law Article 121. This episode breaks down the differences between Criminal Obstruction of Breathing under PL § 121.11, Strangulation in the Second Degree under PL § 121.12, and Strangulation in the First Degree under PL § 121.13, including how charges can range from a Class A misdemeanor to Class D and Class C violent felonies.Listeners will learn how Bronx prosecutors, including the Bronx DA’s Domestic Violence Bureau, build strangulation cases using 911 recordings, medical records, SANE examinations, CT scans, ER notes, photographs, police observations, and witness statements. The discussion also explains how “physical injury” under PL § 10.00(9) differs from “serious physical injury” under PL § 10.00(10), and why findings such as petechiae, voice changes, loss of consciousness, hyoid bone fractures, or other medical evidence can influence whether a case proceeds in Bronx Criminal Court or Bronx Supreme Court.The episode also covers the serious consequences that can follow a strangulation conviction, including jail or state prison exposure, mandatory post-release supervision, probation, orders of protection, Criminal Contempt charges under PL § 215.50 or PL § 215.51, firearm restrictions, immigration concerns, employment barriers, housing issues, and custody or visitation consequences in Bronx Family Court. It highlights the role of arraignment, bail, full stay-away orders, refrain-from orders, and how prosecutors may continue a case even when a complainant recants or does not want to testify.David Mejia Colgan, Esq., a former prosecutor with the Bronx County District Attorney’s Office and a New York University School of Law graduate, brings more than 25 years of criminal law experience to defending domestic violence and strangulation allegations throughout the Bronx and New York State. Serving communities including Fordham, Mott Haven, Hunts Point, Kingsbridge, Highbridge, University Heights, Tremont, Morris Park, Pelham Bay, and Spanish-speaking clients across New York City, his office at 910 Grand Concourse, Suite 1F provides confidential case reviews at (718) 484-8820. David Mejia Colgan, Esq 910 Grand Concourse Suite 1F, Bronx, NY 10451, United States (718) 484-8820 https://www.google.com/maps?cid=10458568621536558650

What Penalties Can Nursing Homes Face for Violations Under MGL 111 72E? - Colucci, Colucci & Marcus, P.C.

From Colucci, Colucci & Marcus, P.C. - What Penalties Can Nursing Homes Face for Violations Under MGL 111 72E? examines how Massachusetts nursing homes may face fines, license revocation, administrative sanctions, court enforcement, and civil lawsuits when residents are harmed by unsafe care or rights violations. This episode explains how MGL c. 111, § 72E works with MGL c. 111, § 72, the Massachusetts Department of Public Health, and long-term care regulations to protect nursing home residents across Boston, Greater Boston, Milton, Quincy, Braintree, Dedham, and Norfolk County. Listeners will learn what types of violations can trigger penalties, including inadequate nursing care, medication errors, pressure ulcers, fall prevention failures, improper restraints, staffing deficiencies under 105 CMR 150.000, retaliation, privacy violations, improper discharges, mishandling of resident funds, and failures involving personal records. The discussion also covers related patient-abuse protections under MGL c. 111, §§ 72F-72L, including abuse, neglect, mistreatment, and misappropriation of resident property. The episode breaks down how DPH investigations work, from anonymous complaints and unannounced inspections to Statements of Deficiencies, correction plans, Chapter 197 of the Acts of 2024, civil fines, Superior Court injunctions under MGL c. 111, § 72(c), receivership under MGL c. 111, § 72M, and separate federal enforcement by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Families will also hear how Medicare, Medicaid, federal civil monetary penalties, and Medicare’s Care Compare tool can interact with Massachusetts enforcement. Colucci, Colucci & Marcus, P.C. also explains how a private civil lawsuit differs from a DPH citation and how residents or families may seek compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, wrongful death under MGL c. 229, § 2, consumer protection claims under MGL c. 93A, and negligence claims governed by the three-year statute of limitations under MGL c. 260, § 2A. Featuring the work of Dino M. Colucci, Darin Colucci, and Matthew J. Marcus, this episode offers guidance for families considering legal action in Norfolk County Superior Court, Suffolk County Superior Court, and communities throughout Massachusetts. Colucci, Colucci & Marcus, P.C. 424 Adams St #101, Milton, MA 02186, United States (617) 698-6000 https://www.google.com/maps?cid=6757336485323234120

Uncontested vs. Contested Divorce in New York: What's the Difference? - Richard Roman Shum

From Law Office of Richard Roman Shum, Esq. - Uncontested vs. Contested Divorce in New York: What's the Difference? explains how couples in New York can determine whether their divorce may proceed by agreement or requires court intervention. This episode breaks down the major differences between uncontested and contested divorce, including cost, timeline, stress, court involvement, and the impact of disputes over property division, spousal maintenance, child custody, parenting time, and child support. Listeners will learn how New York law treats divorce issues under DRL § 236(B), DRL § 240, DRL § 230, DRL § 170(7), DRL § 237(a), and Family Court Act § 413, including how equitable distribution, the Child Support Standards Act, and residency requirements affect the process. The discussion also covers key filings and court procedures such as the Summons with Notice, Summons and Verified Complaint, Statement of Net Worth, preliminary conference, temporary orders, discovery, settlement agreement, stipulation of settlement, Index Number, Note of Issue, and Judgment of Divorce. Richard Roman Shum, a Manhattan divorce attorney and lifelong New Yorker based in the Lower East Side, shares insight into how divorce cases unfold in the Supreme Court, especially when they involve complex finances, high-value assets, real estate, business interests, custody disputes, or an uncooperative spouse. The episode also compares typical uncontested divorce costs of $1,500 to $5,000 with contested divorce costs that may range from $15,000 to more than $100,000, along with timelines that can range from a few months to several years. Serving clients throughout Manhattan, Brooklyn, Queens, and the Bronx, the Law Office of Richard Roman Shum, Esq. helps individuals evaluate whether mediation, settlement, uncontested divorce, or litigation is the right path for their circumstances. For guidance on divorce costs, custody, support, property division, or filing in New York, listeners can contact the Law Office of Richard Roman Shum, Esq. at (646) 259-3416 or visit the office at 20 Clinton Street in Manhattan’s Lower East Side. Law Office of Richard Roman Shum, Esq 20 Clinton St FRNT 5D, New York, NY 10002, United States (646) 259-3416 https://www.google.com/maps?cid=3597344583150276913

When Does Stalking Escalate to a Felony Under NY Penal Law §§ 120.50, 120.55, and 120.60? - David Mejia Colgan

From David Mejia Colgan, Esq. - When Does Stalking Escalate to a Felony Under NY Penal Law §§ 120.50, 120.55, and 120.60? explores how stalking charges move from misdemeanor offenses to felony allegations under NY Penal Law §§ 120.50, 120.55, and 120.60. This episode breaks down the difference between fourth-degree stalking under § 120.45, third-degree stalking under § 120.50, second-degree stalking under § 120.55, and first-degree stalking under § 120.60, while explaining how factors like a prior stalking conviction, weapon display, physical injury, sexual contact, or targeting a child under 14 can change the seriousness of the case.Listeners will hear how New York classifies stalking as a Class B misdemeanor, Class A misdemeanor, Class E felony, or Class D felony depending on the conduct involved and the defendant’s criminal history. The discussion also covers penalties such as up to four years in prison for a Class E felony, up to seven years for a Class D felony, fines up to $5,000, final orders of protection under Criminal Procedure Law § 530.13, and additional felony exposure for criminal contempt under Penal Law § 215.51 when an order of protection is violated.The episode also looks at how felony stalking cases may involve related allegations, including aggravated harassment under Penal Law § 240.30, assault, menacing, burglary, trespass, and sex offense allegations under Article 130, such as Forcible Touching or Sexual Abuse in the Second Degree. It explains how SORA registration under New York Correction Law Article 6-C may become an issue in first-degree stalking cases involving qualifying sexual conduct, and why digital evidence like texts, emails, social media messages, GPS data, and call logs often plays a central role in these prosecutions.David Mejia Colgan, Esq., a former Bronx prosecutor and graduate of New York University School of Law, brings more than 25 years of criminal law experience to clients facing stalking, domestic violence, sex crimes, and serious felony charges. Based at 910 Grand Concourse, Suite 1F, Bronx, NY 10451, with an additional office in Westchester County, the Law Offices of David Mejia Colgan, Esq. represents clients in Bronx Supreme Court, Bronx Criminal Court, NYC, Manhattan, Westchester, and Yonkers, helping them understand course-of-conduct allegations, lawful purpose defenses, Fourth Amendment suppression issues, plea options, and defense strategies for charges under §§ 120.50, 120.55, and 120.60. David Mejia Colgan, Esq 910 Grand Concourse Suite 1F, Bronx, NY 10451, United States (718) 484-8820 https://www.google.com/maps?cid=10458568621536558650

Domestic Violence Assault Charges in the Bronx, NY - David Mejia Colgan

From David Mejia Colgan, Esq. - Domestic Violence Assault Charges in the Bronx, NY explores how domestic violence assault cases are prosecuted in the Bronx, what happens after an arrest, and why charges under PL § 120.00, PL § 120.05, and PL § 120.10 can carry serious consequences. This episode breaks down how New York treats “domestic violence assault” as an assault charge under Penal Law Article 120 with a domestic violence designation when the alleged victim qualifies under CPL § 530.11.Listeners will learn how the Bronx District Attorney’s Office handles these cases, why prosecutors may move forward even if a complainant wants to drop the charges, and what can happen at arraignment in Bronx Criminal Court. The discussion also covers temporary orders of protection, Bronx Supreme Court felony proceedings, Bronx IDV Court, mandatory arrest policies under CPL § 140.10, and related charges such as criminal obstruction of breathing, strangulation, and criminal contempt under PL § 215.50 and PL § 215.51.The episode highlights the potential penalties for Assault in the Third Degree, Assault in the Second Degree, and Assault in the First Degree, including jail, state prison, probation, post-release supervision, mandatory programs, long-term orders of protection, firearm restrictions under the Lautenberg Amendment, and immigration consequences under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(E). It also explains defenses such as self-defense under PL § 35.15, false allegations, lack of physical injury, misidentification, constitutional violations, and challenges to the domestic relationship designation.David Mejia Colgan, Esq., a former prosecutor in the Bronx County DA’s Office and founder of the Law Offices of David Mejia Colgan, Esq., brings more than 30 years of criminal defense experience to cases throughout Mott Haven, Hunts Point, Highbridge, Fordham, Belmont, Tremont, Soundview, Parkchester, Throgs Neck, Pelham Bay, Riverdale, Kingsbridge, Wakefield, and beyond. With offices at 910 Grand Concourse, Suite 1F, Bronx, NY 10451, David represents clients in Bronx Criminal Court, Bronx Supreme Court, Bronx IDV Court, and courts across New York City, Westchester, Rockland, and Nassau. David Mejia Colgan, Esq 910 Grand Concourse Suite 1F, Bronx, NY 10451, United States (718) 484-8820 https://www.google.com/maps?cid=10458568621536558650

What Is Criminal Obstruction of Breathing Under NY Penal Law § 121.11 and How Is It Charged in Bronx DV Cases? - David Mejia Colgan

From David Mejia Colgan, Esq. - What Is Criminal Obstruction of Breathing Under NY Penal Law § 121.11 and How Is It Charged in Bronx DV Cases? explores how criminal obstruction of breathing is prosecuted in Bronx domestic violence cases, why this Class A misdemeanor can carry consequences far beyond its classification, and what defendants should understand after an arrest. This episode explains NY Penal Law § 121.11, including allegations involving pressure to the throat or neck, blocking the nose or mouth, and the prosecution’s burden to prove specific intent to impede breathing or blood circulation.Listeners will learn how the Bronx District Attorney’s Office and its Domestic Violence Bureau approach these cases, including the role of mandatory arrest policies under CPL § 140.10, arraignment in Bronx Criminal Court, temporary orders of protection, and the possibility of proceedings in Bronx County Supreme Court. The discussion also covers how prosecutors may rely on 911 recordings, medical records, photographs, witness statements, prior statements, and legal issues involving Crawford v. Washington when a complainant recants or does not testify.The episode also breaks down how a § 121.11 charge can escalate into felony strangulation under NY Penal Law § 121.12 or § 121.13, with potential penalties ranging from 364 days in jail for a misdemeanor to 7 or 15 years in prison for felony allegations. David Mejia Colgan, Esq., a former Assistant District Attorney in the Bronx County District Attorney’s Office with more than 30 years of criminal law experience, discusses defenses such as lack of intent, false accusation, legal insufficiency, and self-defense under NY Penal Law § 35.15.This episode also highlights the collateral consequences of a conviction, including federal firearms restrictions under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9), immigration risks, child custody concerns, employment issues, professional licensing problems, and the impact of an order of protection on housing and family contact. Serving clients throughout the Bronx, Riverdale, and surrounding boroughs, David Mejia Colgan, Esq. explains why early legal intervention can be critical for protecting rights, challenging evidence, addressing orders of protection, and preventing a misdemeanor case from becoming a felony prosecution. David Mejia Colgan, Esq 910 Grand Concourse Suite 1F, Bronx, NY 10451, United States (718) 484-8820 https://www.google.com/maps?cid=10458568621536558650

Can I Sue a Nursing Home Under the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Law? - Colucci, Colucci & Marcus, P.C.

From Colucci, Colucci & Marcus, P.C. - Can I Sue a Nursing Home Under the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Law? explores how Chapter 93A of the Massachusetts General Laws may apply when nursing homes engage in unfair or deceptive business conduct tied to admissions promises, billing practices, transfers, or care-related representations. This episode explains how the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act can strengthen nursing home abuse claims by allowing families to pursue accountability beyond ordinary negligence. It covers deceptive admissions materials, improper charges, billing fraud, systemic understaffing, and violations of consumer-protection regulations under 940 CMR 4.00. Listeners will also learn how Chapter 93A claims differ from negligence lawsuits, including the demand letter requirement, the four-year statute of limitations, mandatory attorney’s fees, and the possibility of double or triple damages for knowing or willful violations. The discussion highlights the role of evidence such as admissions contracts, billing records, staffing logs, medical records, witness statements, and Massachusetts Department of Public Health inspection reports. Featuring Colucci, Colucci & Marcus, P.C. attorneys Dino M. Colucci, Darin Colucci, and Matthew J. Marcus, this episode offers guidance for families in Boston, Milton, Quincy, Braintree, Brockton, Suffolk County, Norfolk County, and throughout Massachusetts who are evaluating legal options after nursing home abuse, neglect, or deceptive facility practices. Colucci, Colucci & Marcus, P.C. 424 Adams St #101, Milton, MA 02186, United States (617) 698-6000 https://www.google.com/maps?cid=6757336485323234120

What Happens to Retirement Accounts and Pensions in a Chicago Divorce? - Caesar & Bender, LLP

From Caesar & Bender, LLP - What Happens to Retirement Accounts and Pensions in a Chicago Divorce? explores how retirement accounts and pensions are classified, valued, and divided under Illinois law, offering a detailed look at the legal and financial considerations that shape equitable distribution. The discussion centers on how the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act (IMDMA), 750 ILCS 5/503, governs marital versus non-marital property, and why contributions made during a marriage—regardless of whose name is on the account—are typically subject to division. Listeners are guided through the nuances of distinguishing pre-marital and marital assets, including the importance of tracing contributions and avoiding commingling. The episode highlights real-world scenarios involving 401(k)s, IRAs, pensions, and deferred compensation plans, while explaining how tools like Qualified Domestic Relations Orders (QDROs) and Qualified Illinois Domestic Relations Orders (QILDROs) function. Special attention is given to Illinois-specific systems such as IMRF, TRS, and MEABF, and how these differ from ERISA-governed plans. Michael Ian Bender and Molly E. Caesar share insight into the practical realities of divorce proceedings in Cook County, DuPage County, Lake County, and Will County, including valuation challenges, tax implications under Internal Revenue Code § 408(d)(6) and IRS Publication 504, and the risks of mishandling retirement assets. The episode also breaks down negotiation strategies within marital settlement agreements and how courts weigh factors like earning capacity, length of marriage, and financial circumstances when determining equitable distribution. The conversation concludes with a focus on avoiding costly mistakes, from failing to secure a QDRO to overlooking beneficiary designations, and emphasizes the long-term financial consequences of retirement division decisions. With perspectives drawn from experience in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois Appellate Court, DePaul University College of Law, and beyond, this episode delivers a comprehensive look at protecting financial interests during divorce while navigating complex legal frameworks. Caesar & Bender, LLP 150 N Michigan Ave #2130, Chicago, IL 60601 (312) 236-1500 https://www.google.com/maps?cid=10482794179944044586

27 de 178