Notas del episodio
GPT-5.5, Anthropic-Amazon compute expansion, the May 8 OpenAI remediation deadline, and NIST's critical-infrastructure AI RMF concept note all point to the same operator question: when model access changes during the week, do routing rules, fallback paths, patch ownership, and evidence controls still hold?
- A stronger model is a routing change, not just a capability upgrade.
- Tier variance and fallback behavior create immediate operator drift risk.
- Compute concentration and provider dependence belong in workflow continuity planning.
- Dated remediation deadlines need named owners and daily evidence, not passive awareness.
- One weekly owner/evidence/due-date control map is more useful than another abstract AI policy memo.
Run one model-routing control check:
- Name the primary model, fallback model, and escalation owner.
- Re-test the top 10 prompts across primary and fallback paths.
- Measure correction load, access variance, and failure rate by team.
- Publish one dated remediation status block.
- Create one standards-shaped owner/evidence/due-date control map for a critical workflow.