Why Agentic AI Was Always Going t...
IA
Why Agentic AI Was Always Going to Fail: The Named-Human Test and the Evidence Behind It
IA

The Other AI: Audio Briefings on Augmented Intelligence and ... por Basil C. Puglisi

Notas del episodio

The agentic AI era promised to replace humans with autonomous systems. The evidence says that project failed on two fronts: the technology has not delivered reliable replacement, and the public is rejecting the premise even where it partially works.

This episode is an audio overview of the white paper "Why Agentic AI Was Always Going to Fail," published at basilpuglisi.com. The paper introduces the Named-Human Test, a single sorting question that classifies any AI system: is there a named human with binding authority over the output who answers through moral, professional, civil, or criminal accountability?

The episode covers:

The production evidence: agents completing roughly 24 percent of workplace tasks, multi-step accuracy collapsing by nearly half ... 

Leer más
Palabras clave
AI governanceaugmented intelligencehuman-AI collaborationAI regulationSuperintelligenceAI risk economyNamed-Human TestColorado AI lawMIT Delphi studyagentic AI
Sobre qué lugar trata este episodio
Dónde está producido este episodio