3 Step Analysis to § 1367:

1. Does §1367 give supplemental jurisdiction?
   1. Common nucleus of operative facts? (Gibbs)
2. Does 1367(b) take it away?
   1. Is original jurisdiction founded solely on diversity under § 1332?
   2. Is it a claim by plaintiff against person made party under Rule 14, 19, 20, or 24? OR Is it a claim by a person to be joined as plaintiff under Rule 19 or intervene as plaintiff under Rule 24?
   3. Would supplemental jurisdiction be inconsistent with requirements of § 1332?

[If "yes" to all 3, then §1367(b) takes it away]

1. Should the court exercise discretion to decline under § 1367(c)?