Case Summary:

In the case of Abadi v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. (Docket No. 25-38), argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on February 18, 2026, the relevant facts are as follows:

The litigation was initiated by Aaron Abadi, a pro se plaintiff with a sensory processing disorder, against Greyhound Lines, Inc., following his inability to travel on the company’s buses during the federal COVID-19 mask mandate.

The core factual dispute involves the plaintiff’s request for a reasonable accommodation to travel without a face mask, for which he provided a medical note documenting his condition.

Greyhound’s response to the request required the plaintiff to adhere to a specific exemption procedure, which included providing curren ...