“Candace Owens v. Erika Kirk: The...
“Candace Owens v. Erika Kirk: The Cost of Conspiracy and the Ethics of Influence” with Simone Rizkallah | Ep. 13

Bioethics Babe por Arina Grossu Agnew

Notas del episodio

What happens when influence is exercised without restraint and conspiracy replaces evidence?

In today’s episode of Bioethics Babe, I’m joined by Simone Rizkalla, Catholic educator, speaker, writer, and host of the Beyond Rome podcast to examine the controversy surrounding Candace Owens and Erika Kirk, not as internet drama, but as a serious ethical case study.

This conversation explores the cost of conspiracy thinking, the moral responsibilities that come with large platforms, and how misinformation, reputational harm, and reckless speculation threaten human dignity, truth, and community trust in the digital age.

We ask hard questions:

  • Are influencers ethically obligated to verify claims before amplifying them?
  • When does “just asking questions” cross into moral harm?
  • How does conspiracy ... 
Leer más
Palabras clave
bioethicsBioethics BabeBioethics PodcastBioethics Babe PodcastArina Grossu AgnewArina Grossuhuman dignityCatholic bioethicsCandace OwensErika KirkSimone Rizkallahethics of influenceconspiracy theoriesmisinformationdigital ethicsmedia ethicsreputational harmtruth and moralityChristian ethics culture warpublic influencescandalfalse witnesssocial media ethics